Thursday, December 28, 2006

Another Positive Review of WED

“There is something special about a long sultry night of racing at Arlington Stadium. Prolific speedway writer Jeff Scott has managed to capture that, and the less memorable meetings as well, in his latest book…[written] from down there amid the programme boards and baseball caps on the terraces as he brings us the characters, comics and cynics he meets on his travels….Scott can offer some cutting humour when required..the chapter dealing with the [Eagles End of Season Dinner Dance] is one of the most fun.”

Brian Owen, Brighton Evening Argus

Thursday, December 21, 2006

The Blunsdon Blog

If you haven't already clicked on this link on this page then please do so immediately if you want an authentic insight into the trials and tribulations of track preparation.

It really is quite something as the dedication, obsessiveness, skill and humour of the characters (including 'Punch' and Gerard Richter among a cast of not so many) that make up the track team at the Abbey Stadium is captured so well in words and photographs by Graham Cooke.

Bookmark it now as it shines a light on something that is so often taken for granted or even, heaven forefend, criticised!

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Sussex Express Review of WED

Picking over the Eagles’ bones



RARELY – if ever – can a club’s speedway season have been so picked over as the Eastbourne Eagles’ 2005 campaign.
It’s been given the Jeff Scott treatment – the Brighton-based author and self-confessed speedway nut who earlier this year gave us Showered in Shale.
That mammoth tome was a trip around virtually every speedway track in the country.
Jeff’s latest offering – When Eagles Dared – turns the microscope on the men from Arlington, charting the highs and lows of a highly unpredictable season.
He has a quirky style and gives readers something they do not get from the local papers, and the national speedway magazine – a view of the sport from the terraces.
Steen Jensen – a Danish rider who was tipped for big things with the Eagles – is a constant theme throughout the book.
Sadly for Steen and the Eagles, it doesn’t make happy reading for the youngster.
He struggled badly – often well off the pace – and managed to record only two heat wins in the whole campaign.
No wonder he disappeared without trace.
Steen keeps turning up like a bad penny but there is much more as Eastbourne’s roller-coaster season ended them with making the play-offs – to the surprise of many commentators.
Eastbourne fans will find much to savour and When Eagles Dared will make a perfect Christmas present for a fan and will help while away the dark winter nights before the action starts again next March.
When Eagles Dared by Jeff Scott, £10. ISBN: 0-9553103-1-8. You can order on-line at:
www.methanolpress.com
Richard Weston

Friday, December 08, 2006

High Praise from Peter Oakes for 'When Eagles Dared'

“[When Eagles Dared is] Jeff Scott's riveting personalised account of Eastbourne's 2005 campaign….it's a companion to Jeff's better known book 'Showered in Shale'….some of the material may be a little dated now but it is still a remarkable read and something completely different to any other books on the overcrowded market. Jeff has a very personal style that you might either love or hate but I found it riveting and enjoyed almost every word."

PETER OAKES, Speedway Star, 2nd December 2006

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

John Berry book review

While the world of public pronouncements gets blander and blander when it comes to saying something controversial, having a strong opinion or uttering something that will even vaguely offend, you could be forgiven for thinking that many people apparently prefer moderation and weasel words to honesty. Even contemporary British speedway has started to become a little too ‘corporate’ in some quarters and there’s an increased tendency for everyone to smile for the telly like a synchronised swimmer or to publicly pretend that nothing is at all wrong with this great sport. Luckily, John Berry’s latest book ‘More Confessions’ has just been published to correct this imbalance and should definitely create a few waves in responsible speedway circles.

Apparently John is a man who inspires strong opinions and, as his friend James Easter notes in his introduction, “he can still provoke a full scale riot in a telephone box.” Prior to its publication someone remarked dismissively to me that “Berry had nothing left to say” after his first, widely acclaimed ‘Confessions of a Speedway Promoter’ book. You only have to read the first few pages of his latest opus to appreciate that this is certainly not the case and that he is again going to ride a wide variety of his hobbyhorses. And jolly good hobbyhorses they are too as he ranges widely over some aspects of his own career and those of others, the history of the sport, provides his own review of where we find ourselves now, plus where the sport should think about going in the future if it’s to survive in a vibrant form in this country. If the first book was about John Berry (“me in speedway”) then he’s keen to stress that the latest book is “more about the speedway in me.”

Refreshingly, he’s never afraid to settle old scores or to highlight shortcomings in other peoples words or deeds but, more importantly, he also praises many different people fulsomely (for example he’s a huge fan of Peter Adams who he frequently lauds and whom he describes as the “cleverest and hardest to get the better of” and also believes that John Louis should be honoured for his services to the sport). The book assembles a rich cast of characters that, if this were a pantomime would see some loudly booed by the audience, or locked in the stocks, whereas others would run the risk of beatification. Most tellingly, though quick to analyse others John is a man unafraid to acknowledge his own failings but also equally quick to identify and praise his own strengths. In less capable hands this would be a handicap to the enjoyment of any book and definitely will be if the reader is already prejudiced against John Berry or what you perceive to be his outlook and stance. However, I believe that it’s his acuity about people - their individual characters and foibles, their all too human emotions and failings – that shows his gift as a writer and makes this book come alive for the careful reader. Plus there are his many unique turns of phrase to entertain and his perceptive insights into many speedway matters that you thought you knew everything about already.

Nonetheless, it’s a difficult book to categorise since it’s a varied mix that is part memoir, part history and, most enjoyably, part manifesto for the future with a bit of soapbox and some cutting asides thrown in. That said, it’s definitely a book that everyone should consider buying if only for the chapter entitled “King for a Day” which divides into two incisive parts, “Spotting the Problems” and “The Reconstruction.” I’m sure that not everyone featured in this book is going to always feel that comfortable to read about themselves viewed through the eyes of this author but, approached with an open mind, for most readers this will be a real page turner that repays the effort of a quick read or of earnest study.

What exactly do you get for your money? Well, there are 256 pages that present various topics that include ruminations upon who should be rewarded by the honours system as well as the cast of possible dinner party companions at John’s house. Though, as the book makes clear, many characters he has encountered have previously blotted their proverbial copybooks, so it’s safe to say that John Postlethwaite (“I cannot help but feel that Postlethwaite fell across speedway. I suspect it would have made little difference to him had it been wellie-throwing or conkers.”), Dick Barrie, Len Silver or Ian Thomas (“it would have been uncharitable of me to involve him and me in legal proceedings because even now we both seem to enjoy scoring points from each other and to be quite honest I enjoy the rough and tumble, but he really ought to be more careful and get his jibes factually correct.”) won’t get to hear the Berry record collection any time soon.

They all might miss out on some nosh and convivial conversation, but as readers we’re again treated (as we were in the last) to many of the lyrics of the key songs in John’s life – often appositely chosen and sometimes rewritten for even greater effect. There’s also a sincere and often witty critique of every track he’s ever visited (“the whole place had the feel of a badly operated breakers yard”) as well as another chapter that addresses that well-worked speedway book canard, ‘who is the greatest rider of all time?’ It’s a question answered by an analysis that considers skill, equipment and mental strength (“Mich always seemed to remain an artist”). There’s even a quirky but pleasantly excitable look at his favourite all time referees - along with analysis of the worst ones – and he’s particularly strong on obscure long forgotten regionally based referee’s from the 1970s. We’re treated to various insights into the history of speedway bike and engine design as well as a diverse range of topics from youth development to the impact of technology (“the margins for error for the riders are shrinking all the time”). These chapters are never dull - even when some of the topics, people or events have slipped from memory or into the mists of time – and they’re enlivened with wit, direct comments and enjoyable digressions.

Judged solely on the evidence of this book, John Berry is a passionate man and this communicates itself throughout the book where he can touchingly get just as worked up about still keenly remembered slights as he can about the perceived modern day inadequacies and iniquities of UK speedway administration (“speedway in the UK might be a bit of a joke at the moment, but it certainly isn’t funny”). He even actually praises (!) the BSI run SGP series before he goes on to be slightly more critical (“the SGP organisers seem as if they ran out of ideas some time ago…on behalf of the speedway public, the professional promoters and those riders who don’t get selected to take part in the BSI circus, I resent the hijacking of the best dates, the best riders and their best efforts. I object to every other competition being reduced to, at best, second class status”).



This is a book that you have to read to make your mind up about for yourself. Hopefully, if enough people do so, then some of his wide-ranging prognostications might start to provoke change, debate or even provide a possible starting point for a blueprint for future action.

Love him or loathe him, this book shows that you definitely can’t ignore him!

Despite his strenuous claims to the contrary that this really is his “last book”, I’m looking forward to reading the next instalment from this provocative writer before too long.

John Berry will be signing copies of his book at the Brighton Bonanza. Alternatively, you can order a copy – post free in the UK – on the Retro Speedway credit card hotline (01708) 734502, online at www.retro-speedway.com or by post from 103 Douglas Road, Hornchurch, Essex RM11 1AW (cheque payable to Retro Speedway)

Saturday, December 02, 2006

Blog Article in the Independent

Speedway fan Rob Griffin kindly contacted me about an article that he was doing on the phenomenon of blogging for the Independent newspaper.

Having read the article it seems that I’m missing a few tricks when it comes to making money from this activity. It would be great to figure out who on earth would like to have their advert appear on my Blog and who or what they think the average speedway fan really is. I’d have thought that advertisers would always want to reach sincere, down to earth people who loyally support their chosen hobby through thin and thin. It’s just the sort of mindset and characteristics that should appeal given how fickle and disloyal every modern consumer apparently is nowadays.

May be advertisers are fundamentally confused by the complex and arcane rules of the sport. News from the BSPA Conference of the promoter’s decision-making and rule changes for the 2007 season probably won’t have clarified things too much for anyone not already steeped in the speedway way. In the way of the modern world the photos in the Speedway Star, like the statements issued in print and online, look and sound corporate and portentous. But you have to worry that they won’t provide any additional appeal to undecided potential advertisers or deliver more new punters through the turnstiles. In a show of public unanimity that’s rarer behind the scenes, every club promoter has rushed to embrace the wonder and efficacy of the changes. Changes to do with the gate position of the number two rider in the first race look purely cosmetic and are unlikely to affect race results but, most significantly, cost nothing to implement (though the stated reason of keeping this riders kevlars cleaner for longer might well be met). The new restriction that riders with the top two averages will have to ride in positions one and three will thereby structurally weaken the appeal of heat 13. The argument that each contest will reach a crescendo and an appealing denouement to thrill the stay away fans by having the “four best riders in heat 15” assumes a finely balanced contest (e.g. still not so likely at Peterborough or Sheffield) and structurally eliminates this possibility from two heats earlier (when the score might also be closer). I was one of the few (91) people who apparently voted for the status quo and the retention of the present regulations with regards to tactical rides in the recent Speedway Star ballot. I’m ignoring the fiddling with the points limits for teams in each league as these will be beyond the ken of all but the most interested and obsessed followers, taken as a package overall the changes look cost neutral, presentationally vague if intended to wow new people or sponsors and much more in the order of recovering the deck chairs with a new material and slightly altering their formation on the deck.

Still, just as a camel is a racehorse designed by a committee the voting structure of the BSPA has a structural bias towards the status quo. Every if you discount the oligopolistic tendencies of some groups of existing promoters, the fact that apparently the rules of membership of this association that deprives every ‘rookie’ promoter of a vote will inevitably exaggerate this effect. My understanding is that new promoters and their ideas are often like fireworks – they sparkle and flare initially but soon fizzle out in the face of inertia and physics. Sensibly enough so that all this new found zeal and enthusiasm doesn’t have too much of a warping effect on the hidebound nature of the sports rules and direction, all new promoters can attend the BSPA conference but are unable to vote for three years. On this basis among the Elite League promoters, for example, it’s my understanding that Peterborough, Reading, Belle Vue, Oxford and Arena Essex wouldn’t be able to vote. May be I’m wrong but while constancy and loyalty should have it’s privileges, it might be taking it just a step too far to only allow just six EL clubs the vote? And we all know avian creatures are more circumspect in the festive season. Not that I’m necessarily a big fan of John Postlethwaite’s many gnomic pronouncements on how the sport needs to adapt to his (commercial) interests and instincts or die but in the kingdom may be the eleven eyed man is better than the six eyed one?

Arguably the most positive piece of news from the BSPA conference was the announcement that 15 clubs (what about the rest? If the reason is not the curfew it’s hard to imagine what it might be) would actively support the Under 15s in the second halves next season. Hopefully, the switch to a more formal basis will move these races from the category of a dispensable afterthought – the meeting over runs or the curfew approaches, so the automatic reflex among promoters has often been to abandon or curtail these races - that they’ve suffered from sometimes this season under the keen and dedicated stewardship of Peter Oakes. I imagine getting permission for pupils to miss school nowadays to travel long distances to ride on a speedway bike is going to be much harder in the modern environment of frequent tests at all ages and will remain an impediment outside the summer holiday months. However, as this decision acknowledges, unless the sport invests structurally in gaining sufficient numbers of young people to come through the ranks as riders, then future prospects will look bleaker than they are already now. The news that the sport has finally decided to start to provide a structure that probably might throw up a possible future world champion isn’t going to get the sponsors or crowds flooding back immediately but at least shows belief in the future. All that’s needed now is for this to be formalised as a rider development programme and actual funds invested to ensure that it continues rather than changes on a stop-start basis or undergoes frequent chopping and changing after future conferences.

Overall, if speedway in this country is as traditional as a wet bank holiday in the summer, then having a moan about the decisions “at conference” is also a hardy perennial. This year gave less grounds than usual though the disabling combination of denial and blind optimism prevails. The default setting of all the promoters is always to express “delight” and relish the opportunities for “team building” that have been held in abeyance in the month prior to these always apparently innovative tablets coming down the mountain. The speedway faithful will still turn out no matter what is decided as a grumble makes the whole thing much more enjoyable. Though one factor, buried away in the Speedway Star, not given any real prominence is the price rise of £1 in admission prices for adults that Peterborough have already announced. In the spirit of selective and oligopolistic co-operation that invariably kicks in at this point among the promoters were self interest and money collide, it’s safe to say that by March it’s likely that admission prices across the board will reach £15 for adult admissions in the Elite League. This is an inflation busting rise of over seven percent that, if you say it quickly, is disguised by the phrase “its only a pound more”. Maybe it’s a percentage increase that all the promoters will automatically pass onto their riders when they agree terms in the close season but isn’t the type of increase that many fans will experience in their pay packets (or pension books).